[ubuntu-us-ut] ext3 or XFS

[Bob]

Considering the recent comments, I would seriously consider ext3. Most
Linux distos. default to it for a reason, ;) IMO... just another view.

The Net Duck
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 19:48 -0600, Trevor Sharpe wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Mike Basinger wrote:
> > I not a big fan of ResierFS. Twice I have seen ResierFS crap out on
> > someone presenting something at a conference with it.
> > 
> > Mike
> 
> I hesitate to suggest again, because I have only read about XFS. But I
> think one of the drawbacks, is that you can't resize (someone correct me
> if I am wrong).  I would still lean to XFS purely for ability to tune it
> to your needs with tune2fs.
> 
> - --
> Trevor Sharpe
> E-Mail:		tsharpe at xmission.com
> Jabber:		tsharpe at gmail.com
> - ----------
> Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist
> the black flag, and begin slitting throats.       ---H. L. Mencken
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFH3x+ERDaxm/9432IRAhhBAJ9NAAN5aeKPfWO1UKTSzC8l2evEVQCgnNc6
> lDkYj5bhTXj0WgJgSAZAIe4=
> =lf5e
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>