something to get started

[matthew byers]

Daniel,
There has not been a discussion of date yet. I am trying to take things one
step at a time. Location, date, etc.
Now you talk of not dividing but you are the one trying to divide. I am
asking for as many texas folks as possible meeting up and having a good time
and making plans for the team. That is why i speak of where we can get the
most participation based on folks locations and how far their are willing to
travel. Of course there is nothing wrong with a Dallas geeknic or a Houston
geeknic but having all on the same day at different locations defeats the
purpose of coming together as a team/community and getting the ball rolling.
This geeknic can establish alot of plans for getting more texas loco
involvement rolling. Why would we halt that progress by splitting up and
everyone go their seperate ways and have their own seperate city geeknics.

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Daniel VanStone <webmaster at catcodesigns.net
> wrote:

> Dear Matthew Byers,
> Thank you for clarification
>
> The unfortunate circumstance must have it that
> insists you keep endorsing on certain places.
>
> Or maybe it is just a error in foresight.
>
> But I have heard no discussion of date.
>
> or maybe I missed that (like always)
>
> I will look at it from a different way.
>
> What if:
>
> People could participate in the same activity
> All on the same day in different areas?
>
> Each Group could have their own picnic
>
> Just a thought Because the Dallas and Houston and Amarillo all fall
> under the same state flag.
>
> The 'state' has a real TEXAS GEEKNIK
> I thought the purpose was to help not to divide.
>
> A thought but as I said my opinion.
> Daniel VanStone
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-us-tx mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-tx at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-tx
>
>


-- 
God Bless
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-tx/attachments/20100805/2e7f91d2/attachment.htm