Possible State Meeting Solutions
thebwt at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 19:11:15 GMT 2009
if we need to do some sort of vote, the most efficient way is to open a poll
on the forums and let it sit open for a given period. So at a meeting we
will discuss the topic and that say something like "I am opening a poll that
will be closed in one week, here is the url; go vote." Problem solved.
"Voting" should not the be the focus of our meetings honestly. Any sort of
discussion like that can occur on our mailing lists. The irc meetings should
be a chance for rapid response discussion (in contrast to email which is
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Stone <webmaster at catcodesigns.net>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Dear Texas Team,
> I see several issues with just status quo. It fails because chatter
> on an IRC channel makes it hard to follow and does not give an
> adequate time to address and vote on topics.
> As I have stated before the channel can and has been used but I
> believe that moderation (since it can only happen from select
> individuals) can steer the conversations and discussions.
> When an item needs to be voted on it should be addressed prior to any
> meeting. Also with the announcement of voting item could be a way to
> simply vote on it and a place to enter personal thoughts on that topic
> This was not the case on the last IRC meeting.
> This way an item to vote on could have a week or so to vote on prior
> to discussion to get a true consensus.
> Take this for instance
> one reading this thread would think that the discussions had come to a
> close on a Centex group while in fact
> addresses this just days after the meeting and the forum post
> discussion some basic questions regarding the meeting place were never
> addressed and some of the other basic questions went unanswered.
> This may be the de-facto discussion place but to hold a vote or a poll
> does not say that this service works best. IRC is good for general
> chatter but the facts are already it place. I does not work to address
> and respond to large opposing opinions.
> I see nothing wrong with using google or other other services to take
> up the slack. And I do not see google fading away soon. In fact the
> reason this is still in beta is google has redundancy layers to
> approve new services just as gmail went through.
> I we remain stagnant then the team will remain the same. We need to
> look at the future and adapt to improvements.
> Daniel Sone
> matthew byers wrote:
> > I think we need to consider that too many aspects of meeting options
> > can become an issue...why not irc, then why not wave, then why not
> > dimdim, then why not email meetings...see where im heading with
> > this! If its not broken why mess with it??
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Marc Randolph <mrand at pobox.com
> > <mailto:mrand at pobox.com>> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Daniel Stone
> > <webmaster at catcodesigns.net <mailto:webmaster at catcodesigns.net>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I was referring to how we conduct meetings.
> > > What does a mailing list not have in relation to wave(google
> > wave)?
> > >
> > > one
> > > : a real time effect like chat.
> > >
> > > two
> > > : it offers a place that discussion can happen over the course
> > of a
> > > few days this would be great on voting
> > >
> > > three
> > > : discussions and supporting documents can be in on place
> > making it
> > > much easier to read and follow the discussion.
> > >
> > > Whilst google wave is beta -- dimdim already does this.
> > > [...]
> > If one of the main reasons to switch is so that conversations,
> > votes,
> > and other things can occur over days, I don't place much weight
> > on the
> > real-time aspect. But let's say some people do want
> > near-realtime...
> > all that needs to change is those few people can sign up for
> > gmail or
> > some other email service that doesn't have much polling in the
> > way of
> > a polling delay. Messages are typically delivered in about the same
> > amount of time it takes to type them. Use a subject line, and they
> > are threaded into conversations / topics. Great for organizing.
> > Items two and three are ideally solved by the existing email
> > list, IMHO.
> > I'm truly not trying to be difficult, but I truly don't see why we
> > can't continue to use this mailing list that rather than making
> > _everyone_ that wanted to participate sign up for some random
> > non-official service that might die someday, and take our archived
> > discussions with it.
> > > This message was attempted the way you instructedand I had to
> > add the
> > > mailing list to the to recipients.
> > Worked great. Thanks!
> > Marc
> > --
> > Ubuntu-us-tx mailing list
> > Ubuntu-us-tx at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Ubuntu-us-tx at lists.ubuntu.com>
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-tx
> > --
> > God Bless
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Ubuntu-us-tx mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-tx at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-us-tx