Possible State Meeting Solutions

[Marc Randolph]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Stone
<webmaster at catcodesigns.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Re:Logging
>
> Currently it seems that I am the one who keeps the logs not moot. Also
> a wave is a simple url scheme.
>
> Second wave is not the only technology like this. dimdim is a great
> example.
>
> My thoughts are simple to have the meeting where anyone can view the
> conversation. Anyone of a team can add to the conversation. And also
> that anyone can comment and vote on items not in the matter of an hour
> matbe a day or a week?
>
> This is just proposed. But Texas actually fall into two time zones so
> El Paso sees nine differently than Houston or Dallas.
>
> Using a technology like this would simply allow greater communication.

I assume the mention of "a wave" in the first paragraph refers to
Google Wave.  While I'd love to use it just to be using "technology",
I don't see the benefit it over using it over this standardized email
list.  This email list is auto archived and is THE official point of
communication for the state.  In fact, email much much better than an
IRC because conversation topics and be kept in threads and is much
easier to follow and understand later.  When multiple irc
conversations are going on, it is very, very difficult to follow
later.

BTW, speaking of threads, Daniel could you please hit "reply" when
sending a response to someone.  Every single one of your messages
shows up as a new thread.

   Marc