[Ubuntu-US-PA] 32 bit vs. k64 bit for Linux

Thomas Ward trekcaptainusa.tw at gmail.com
Sun Apr 22 23:00:34 UTC 2012


Depends on the architecture you have and what you need.

32bit is limited to about 3.5-4GB of RAM, and works with older processors
(pre-64bit era).

64GB has a much higher RAM allowance.  Most processors today are 64bit.

Not all programs have 64-bit compatibility though, and are built in 32bit.
 On Ubuntu, you can get the 32bit libraries in a 64bit environment to run
32bit programs.

So really it is down to the architecture and what you want/need.  32bit
works well in most cases though (from my experience).

------
Thomas Ward
Ubuntu Member
LP: trekcaptainusa-tw

On Apr 22, 2012, at 6:51 PM, "Charles E. LaMonte,n3vuo" <n3vuo at yahoo.com>
wrote:

Greetings to all, Which is better for Linux 32 bit or 6+ bit ? Thank you.

ALL MESSAGES. ARE COPYRIGHTED THE DAY, MONTH AND YEAR IN WHICH IT WAS
TYPED. UNLESS COPYRIGHTED BY SOMEONE ELSE.

IF PEOPLE WOULD ONLY BELIEVE AND DO THIS :

THE WORLD IS A DANGEROUS PLACE, NOT BECAUSE OF THOSE WHO DO EVIL, BUT
BECAUSE OF THOSE WHO LOOK ON AND DO NOTING. AMERICAN PHYSICIST. ALBERT EINSTEIN
1879 TO 1955.

Please only respond to: n3vuo at arrl.net.

-- 
Ubuntu-us-pa mailing list
Ubuntu-us-pa at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-pa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-pa/attachments/20120422/ee362b37/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-us-pa mailing list