[ubuntu-us-ma] ubuntu? one
jamespgray at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 22:34:07 GMT 2010
Ubuntu One is a service similar to dropbox.com. You can upload your
files from any internet connected Ubuntu system (9.10 or later; it is
optional software in 9.04) and download on the same or any other
Tonidoplug.com appears to be a hardware solution so quite different.
If you set it up with a dynamic DNS service you could probably get the
same effect although at a just barely less then $100 price tag.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Caroline Meeks
<caroline at solutiongrove.com> wrote:
> Interesting. I'm not up on the debate.
> How does Ubuntu One compare/relate to http://www.tonidoplug.com/ ?
> Looks like Tonido runs on ubuntu and all open source code.
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Daniel Hollocher
> <danielhollocher at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So I've been thinking about the debate over Ubuntu One. I saw this
>> take place a little on ubuntu-devel-discuss, and the main complaint
>> there was the source code for the server was not released. At first,
>> the issue didn't seem like a big deal to me. Who cares if the source
>> code is not release? All Ubuntu One is is a place that you can put
>> your files. There is no vender lock-in, so that limits the problems
>> that can arise.
>> But, there is an issue with the notion of what Ubuntu is overall at
>> stake. Is Ubuntu a commercial venture, or a non-profit venture
>> governed by ideals? I found a posting with Mark Shuttleworth's
>> opinion on the issue , and he seems to think that Ubuntu is his
>> property. Ubuntu is something that he puts together and offers to the
>> community, but he reserves the sole right to make money with Ubuntu.
>> OTOH, I see many people refer to Ubuntu as if it is a non-profit
>> venture worthy of actives like fundraising, and offering free support.
>> Also, the terms for the community to use the Ubuntu trademark is that
>> it be for non-profit (non-commercial maybe?) activities, which
>> furthers the notion that Ubuntu is an ideal.
>> I had assumed that this project by Shuttleworth was going to be a
>> combination of both commercial goals and free software ideals, and I
>> had also assume that those two were divided by the two names chosen
>> for the project, Canonical and Ubuntu. Canonical would be the
>> commercial side, and Ubuntu would be the idealized side. Now my
>> understanding is that Ubuntu is a trademark owned by
>> Canonical/Shuttleworth, and is licensed to the community in a way that
>> doesn't compete with Canonical.
>> I think that is fine in principle. Google is this way. But does it
>> make sense to treat Ubuntu as a non-profit type organization, one
>> where you would donate money and time to support it? Google is
>> structured this way, yet do we have Google LoCOs? Does anyone
>> fundraise on Google's behalf? I don't think these make allot of
>> sense. Why not have a separate org that is non-profit, where we
>> invest our energy and money into? It now seems like people are
>> unpayed employees rather than volunteers.
>> What do you guys think? Martin especially, since you invest so much
>> time, how do you feel about Ubuntu? Do you feel like you are working
>> for an ideal? or a commercial venture? or something else?
>> In science and in mind, the impossible and the hasn't-happened-yet are
>> Ubuntu-us-ma mailing list
>> Ubuntu-us-ma at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> Caroline Meeks
> Solution Grove
> Caroline at SolutionGrove.com
> 617-500-3488 - Office
> 505-213-3268 - Fax
> Ubuntu-us-ma mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-ma at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
More information about the Ubuntu-us-ma