And the unfortunate effects will come soon enough ....<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/19/wireless-carriers-openly-considering-charging-per-service/">http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/19/wireless-carriers-openly-considering-charging-per-service/</a></div> <div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/19/wireless-carriers-openly-considering-charging-per-service/"></a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Luke Faraone <span dir="ltr"><luke@faraone.cc></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5">On 12/21/2010 07:01 AM, Kevin Cole wrote:<br> > The defense? "Well, we could have crafted a worse law..."<br> ><br> > BBC News - Internet rules to get go ahead by US regulators<br> ><br> > <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12046874" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12046874</a><br> <br> </div></div>Well, right now they're adopting regulation which sets standards for<br> fixed-line communications which are the same as the current procedure.<br> It is unfortunate that the same was not adopted for wireless networks.<br> <font color="#888888"><br> --<br> ╒═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╕<br> │Luke Faraone ╭Debian / Ubuntu Developer╮│<br> │<a href="http://luke.faraone.cc" target="_blank">http://luke.faraone.cc</a> ╰Sugar Labs, Systems Admin╯│<br> │PGP: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506 │<br> ╘═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╛<br> <br> </font><br>--<br> Ubuntu-us-dc mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-us-dc@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-us-dc@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-dc" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-dc</a><br> <br></blockquote></div><br></div>