[DC LoCo] 32-bit vs 64-bit ubuntu
kstailey at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 15 03:51:02 BST 2010
32-bit OS on 64-bit-capable hardware is fine.
Most new PeeCees are 64-bit-capable.
--- On Tue, 9/14/10, Phil Shapiro <pshapiro at his.com> wrote:
> From: Phil Shapiro <pshapiro at his.com>
> Subject: [DC LoCo] 32-bit vs 64-bit ubuntu
> To: ubuntu-us-dc at lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 9:47 PM
> hi ubuntistas,
> if i installed ubuntu on a core i3
> notebook that previously had windows
> 7 64-bit, do i need to install the 64-bit version of
> ubuntu? (i.e.
> would the 32-bit version of ubuntu work okay on that
> i've read some places that staying with
> the 32-bit version of ubuntu
> means that you don't run into some headaches down the line
> when the
> apps you want to run aren't available in 64-bit versions.
> Phil Shapiro pshapiro at his.com
> "Wisdom begins with wonder." - Socrates
> "Learning happens thru gentleness."
More information about the Ubuntu-us-dc