Thanks again for the input. I'll probably end up tackling the install this weekend. One last follow up question...:<br><br>I'll be creating the new /home partition in Edgy following the steps <a href="http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/separatehome">
here</a>. One thing that is not mentioned is what happens during the install process for future Ubuntus (gutsy in this case)? <br>When I tell it to use the existing /home partition as "/home" will it reformat the partition? ---I realize this probably doesn't happen since that would defeat the purpose
<br>of having a separate /home partition in the first place... <br><br>Or does the the installer just ignore the files and just assign the appropriate permissions, links, etc to the existing files? I just have some important stuff in there I wouldn't want to lose.
<br>Forgive me for being over-cautious...<br><br>Regards,<br>Ryan<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 14, 2007 7:55 AM, Kevin Fries <<a href="mailto:kfries@cctus.com">kfries@cctus.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:04 -0700, Neal McBurnett wrote:<br>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:18:28PM -0700, Kevin Fries wrote:<br>> > I have begun the conversation in the developers to see if we can try and
<br>> > fix this.<br>> ><br>> > Its more than holy war, its about stability and disaster recovery. The<br>> > one partition fits all approach is very bad in these aspects. That is<br>> > why I have begun the conversation in the developers to try and get it
<br>> > fixed for Hardy.<br>> ><br>> > I know my normal partitioning scheme will likely get labeled too extreme<br>> > in the end, if I can move the default used in installation to a more<br>> > robust system, I will feel completely victorious.
<br>><br>> Um - "victorious"? Comparisons to holy war? I would ask who is the<br>> enemy?<br><br></div>The original comment was about how each person has their ideal<br>partitioning layout. And the arguments can get to resemble a real holy
<br>war similar in stupidity as to which is the best distro. Personally, I<br>prefer a four to five partition layout, and install all my machines (and<br>will be training my guys next week that will be building all of Fighting
<br>Penguin's machines) to use this partitioning method.<br><br>/ = 20GB<br>/boot = 512MB<br>/home = <remainder><br>/var/log = 5GB<br><br>Servers get /home partition replaced with a /srv partition and any<br>machine with more than 2GB of ram gets /tmp mounted tmpfs.
<br><br>For software and web developer machines, a /srv partition is created<br>with 10GB in addition to the /home directory.<br><br>If a machine is marked as highly critical, /etc is on its own partition,<br>then mirrors are set up for /boot, /etc, /home, and /srv. This will
<br>allow for a complete rebuild, and software reset in minutes not hours.<br><br>I don't anticipate that Ubuntu would ever need or even want anything<br>that elaborate. Instead, I am hoping to get /boot, and /home isolated
<br>to make Ubuntu a little more robust and improve disaster recovery.<br><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>--<br>Kevin Fries<br>Senior Linux Engineer<br>Computer and Communications Technology, Inc<br>A Division of Japan Communications Inc.
<br><br>--<br></div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Ubuntu-us-co mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Ubuntu-us-co@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-us-co@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-co" target="_blank">
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-co</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>