[CoLoCo] virtualization in hardy: kvm

Soren Hansen soren at ubuntu.com
Tue Mar 18 16:30:53 GMT 2008


On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:30:31PM -0700, Neal McBurnett wrote:
> So I'm guessing that the goal is to move supported packages like kvm
> to more recent compilers, like the gcc 4.x.x series which has been out
> since early 2005.

Something like that, yes. It's not a big problem that it's old. The
problem is that we have too many compilers in main which is a
maintenance nightmare.

> So this raises a number of questions.
> 
> Can all the cool new libvirt stuff be used with qemu (so a user would
> simply choose kvm or qemu depending on their hardware)?

That's the way it works already.

> Alternatively, how hard would it be to have kvm recompiled with gcc
> 3.4 for non-virtualized hardware, even if it was in universe?

That's *almost* what qemu is anyway :)

> Virtualbox is based in part on QEMU - so does this affet Virtualbox
> OSE at all?

VirtualBox, like kvm, uses qemu's device model, and nothing else, AFAIK,
and it's only the cpu emulation stuff that requires the older gcc, so
no.


-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-co/attachments/20080318/d4e4946b/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Ubuntu-us-co mailing list