[CoLoCo] Standardized Repositories
Michael "TheZorch" Haney
thezorch at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 06:08:27 GMT 2008
I saw an article some time ago that basically pointed out that the
number one thing that was really holding Linux back from becoming fully
mainstream was a lock of Standardization in Linux when it comes to
package management. I responded with saying that Windows had no package
management system at all, and that uninstall programs often leave many
thing behind including registry keys, folders, and .DLL files which only
caught Windows to slow down, but the argument had a good point. Linux
needs a Standardized system of Package Management across all
distributions. Ubuntu and many others use the Debian package managment
system, Red Hat and distros based on it use RPMs, and so on and so
forth. If you want to install an app on Ubuntu that's in an RPM you
can't use Aptitude and need a separate piece of software to do the
install. This starts to make Linux more like Windows with every piece
of software using different types of installers. There should be a
universally accepted package management system adopted by all distros
regardless if they are Debian based, Red Hat based or Slackware based
instead of all of these different competing package management formats.
It starts to get as confusing as the different versions of Windows Vista
for your Average Joe computer user. Thus, the argument is in a way
correct, there are too many different competing types of distros out
there and a single package management format must be chosen if Linux is
going to make further headway.
--
Michael "TheZorch" Haney
thezorch at gmail.com
http://thezorch.googlepages.com/home
AIM: thezorch at gmail.com
Yahoo IM: zorchhaney
ICQ: 343230252
GoogleTalk: thezorch
MSN Messeger: haneymichael at hotmail.com:
More information about the Ubuntu-us-co
mailing list