[CoLoCo] in defense of open source

[Jim Hutchinson]

On 12/6/07, Ringo Kamens <2600denver at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jim agreed to do an interview with Binary Freedom about this article,
> his response, and GNU/Linux in general. I think he did a great job and
> you all might find it interesting. See
> http://binaryfreedom.info/node/269 and if you feel so inclined:
> http://digg.com/linux_unix/Interesting_Interview_About_Linux
> This issue already got on digg once, can we pull it off again?
> Comrade Ringo Kamens

Darn it. No matter how many times I proof read... I still end up with
errors. I found a couple. Any chance they can be fixed?

Q5 technological --> technology

Q6 This type of approach MS --> This type of approach by MS

Probably some more but that's all I see at the moment.

Thanks,
Jim


-- 
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html