I have been playing with Windows 7 and had to recover the system last night. I got a new keyboard this week that came with key macro software. It installed with no problems, but at the next boot into Windows, it started having problems. There was a convenient rollback option that fixed the problem, but come on, a keyboard breaking the OS completely!! <br>
<br clear="all">Michael Wilson<br><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jim Campbell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jwcampbell@ubuntu.com">jwcampbell@ubuntu.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi All,<br><br>Yes, it's kind of my fault for starting it with the reference to Windows in Grub, but I'm starting a new thread for the Windows discussion.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:23 PM, George Lesica <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:glesica@gmail.com" target="_blank">glesica@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">But lawyers are a cautious bunch. Part of the problem is that most<br>
users wouldn't uninstall the MS programs even if it was possible. Just<br>
like many users choose IE because it's just right there. Therefore, MS<br>
would be gaining market share in other markets (anti-virus, word<br>
processing, etc.) through use of the marketing power it gets from its<br>
OS. That could still be construed to be an anti-trust violation<br>
because it could be seen as an attempt at a vertical monopoly.<br>
<br>
Also, other apps ARE bundled with windows by PC manufacturers. When<br>
you buy a copy of windows at retail you are getting just that:<br>
windows.<br>
<br>
What would be interesting is if MS would allow 3rd parties to create<br>
windows "distros" where other (legally licensed of course) software is<br>
bundled with windows to create a custom windows install consumers<br>
could buy at retail.<br>
<br>
Of course that would just add to the confusion my mother feels when<br>
she sees 14 versions of Vista on the shelves. And since MS tries to be<br>
all things to all people they have to try to keep my mother happy by<br>
reducing the choices available so she doesn't get confused.<br>
<div><br>
~ George T. Lesica<br>
<a href="mailto:glesica@gmail.com" target="_blank">glesica@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div>On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Michael McCune <<a href="mailto:mjmccune@gmail.com" target="_blank">mjmccune@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Microsoft would only bundle their programs with Windows and would not<br>
> allow the PC manufacturer or end user to remove the bundled<br>
> applications. If MS would allow other apps to be bundled with Windows<br>
> and allowed bundled Windows apps to be removed, it would not have been a<br>
> problem.<br>
><br>
> George Lesica wrote:<br>
>> On the other hand, part of the reason MS doesn't bundle more software<br>
>> is that the government used that type of software bundling against<br>
>> them in the anti-trust case. Even bundling IE is highly controversial<br>
>> and the EU is considering making them totally strip it out.<br>
>><br>
>> ~ George T. Lesica<br>
>> <a href="mailto:glesica@gmail.com" target="_blank">glesica@gmail.com</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Michael McCune <<a href="mailto:mjmccune@gmail.com" target="_blank">mjmccune@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> That's the way Windows has always been. It didn't even have a browser<br>
>>> until Windows 98.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Randall Wilson wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Oops. If it's any consolation, it's Windows 7 beta and, although very<br>
>>>> smooth and nearly as pretty as Jaunty, is totally useless to me except<br>
>>>> for maybe testing things with IE 8. Did you guys know that a fresh<br>
>>>> Windows install comes with nothing? I don't have time to sit around all<br>
>>>> day and download programs from random sites just to make my computer work!<br>
>>>> :)<br>
>>>> -Randy<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Jim Campbell wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> Hi all,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Most of Randy's menu.list looked fine, but I would like to point out<br>
>>>>> what is surely a major error in the file, though:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> # This entry automatically added by the Debian installer for a<br>
>>>>> non-linux OS<br>
>>>>> # on /dev/sda3<br>
>>>>> title Windows Vista/Longhorn (loader)<br>
>>>>> rootnoverify (hd0,2)<br>
>>>>> savedefault<br>
>>>>> makeactive<br>
>>>>> chainloader +1<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Surely this entry should be removed from the system, as it may provide<br>
>>>>> a backdoor for trojans and viruses of all kinds. :-)<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Jim<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
<br>--<br>
Ubuntu-us-chicago mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-us-chicago@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-us-chicago@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-chicago" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-chicago</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>