[Bug 269127] Re: gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy

[James Westby]

On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:52 +0000, Jason Woofenden wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the additional functionality provided by ffcall in
> gforth is only activated when specifically requested by the programmer
> (as it is in some example scripts that come with gforth). So I don't
> think inclusion of ffcall could possibly break any existing code written
> for gforth.

Ok, I think I'm at a point where I would be willing to upload this
after testing. Could you point out a couple of examples from the gforth
source package that would be good tests and how to run them once I have
the package installed? I'd like a couple that use ffcall and a couple
that don't.

I'll give it a day or so for motu-release to give any other opinions.
One member stated on IRC that they considered this to be a change that
didn't need an FFe, so it would just be if they had any concerns over
the change.

Thanks,

James

-- 
gforth missing libffcall1 dependancy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sponsors for universe, which is a direct subscriber.