<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html><head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> <meta name="generator" content="Osso Notes"> <title></title></head> <body> -- Sent from my Nokia N900 Please do not send me word documents plain txt or pdf are prefered. ----- Mensaje original ----- > I think you may be able to fix this by creating a symbolic link to where > the program is expecting to find the library. As for where it would be > looking, I have no idea... One would assume one of the developers could > shed some light, or perhaps an installation guide or readme file. > On Jul 26, 2011 7:13 PM, "Simon Redmond" <<a href="mailto:simon@sibass.co.uk">simon@sibass.co.uk</a>> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:30 +0200, <a href="mailto:martijn@vandestreek.net">martijn@vandestreek.net</a> wrote: > > > On 26 July 2011 14:32, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <<a href="mailto:andresmp@gmail.com">andresmp@gmail.com</a>> > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are trying to install a software (coventorware) that > > > normally is supported if installed in redhat 4 but "should > > > work" on other linux distros like ubuntu. > > > > > > We managed to install everthing but there is one library that > > > is missing: libgomp.so.1. And we think it's called > > > libgomp(something) in ubuntu (already installed). it seems > > > they are spelt slightly differently. How would I get the > > > coventorware installer to find libgomp? > > > > > > > > > This could be two different problems: > > > > > > > > > 1. You're really missing the library. Try installing "apt-file", then > > > do "apt-file update" and "apt-file search libgomp123.so" (replace > > > with the file name you need) to see which package it's in > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > 2. The software you're trying to run is compiled for 32-bit Linux, > > > and you're running 64-bit LInux. If you install libraries using > > > "apt-get install" you get the 64-bit versions, which can't be used > > > by 32-bit compiled programs. You either need to get a version of > > > your software that's compiled for 64-bit Linux, get the 32-bit > > > libraries on your system somehow, or install 32-bit Ubuntu and try > > > with that. > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > I might be wrong, but this sounds like it could be solved by a symbolic > > link??? > > > > Simon > > > > > > I think you may be able to fix this by creating a symbolic link to where > the program is expecting to find the library. As for where it would be > looking, I have no idea... One would assume one of the developers could > shed some light, or perhaps an installation guide or readme file. So, this symbolic link would it be this? <a href="http://www.techiecorner.com/105/how-to-create-symbolic-link-in-unix/">http://www.techiecorner.com/105/how-to-create-symbolic-link-in-unix/</a> readme says that they only support redhat of the linux distros. Instalation guide is a simple block diagram. Says something in the lines choos folder. Type this and that, should be installed. Create desktop shortcut... I guess i could just install redhat... But the last time i used redhat it looked so dated compared to ubuntu. </body> </html>