Sent from my HTC ----- Reply message ----- From: ubuntu-uk-request@lists.ubuntu.com To: <ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: ubuntu-uk Digest, Vol 68, Issue 44 Date: Wed, Dec 29, 2010 12:00 Send ubuntu-uk mailing list submissions to ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ubuntu-uk-request@lists.ubuntu.com You can reach the person managing the list at ubuntu-uk-owner@lists.ubuntu.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-uk digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Research Required (Barry Drake) 2. Re: [Fwd: Re: [Ubuntu-advertising] Research required ...] (Grant Sewell) 3. Re: Research Required (Neil Greenwood) 4. Re: Research Required (Colin Law) 5. Desktop backgrounds (Dianne Reuby) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:58:27 +0000 From: Barry Drake <bdrake@crosswire.org> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Research Required To: UK Ubuntu Talk <ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <1293566307.1647.9.camel@pcspecialist> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 19:45 +0000, Nigel Verity wrote: > I decided to create a system that would be as familiar to her as > possible. > I created desktop icons for the following basic applications: Sorry about the silly post when I pressed the wrong button. I really like your approach. Maybe we ought have a customised version similar to that specifically for our purposes? I wonder, would Canonical support that approach in view of what we are doing? I'm thinking that the existing proposed desktop, especially with Unity, might not be best for a Windows user. A Windows familiar desktop would certainly help me in the way I work promote Ubuntu. My tagline here might need to be altered to YES exactly the same old thing .... folk don't like change .... -- What do you see when you use your Computer? Same old thing? ...There IS a Better Way! Ubuntu! ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:05:52 +0000 From: Grant Sewell <dcglug@thymox.co.uk> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] [Fwd: Re: [Ubuntu-advertising] Research required ...] To: ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com Message-ID: <20101228200552.20bfc378@hplaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:23:50 +0000 alan c wrote: > On 28/12/10 09:53, Barry Drake wrote: > > > In fact they will be very surprised not to > > be asked to pay! > > This is a recurring and apparent problem. A free app here or there > from an enthusiast group is one thing, maybe used in Windows, but a > complete freedom of a complete system, which one is going to rely on > for stable reliable trusted, ongoing use? How can that be free? Why > is it free? Are they nuts? I usually take the explanatory approach of football. Most people, whether they are "into" football or not, will appreciate that many of the upper league's football players are very good at what they do... and that some of them play matches for charitable causes (ie they do so for no monetary gain of their own) and yet it doesn't mean they instantly become rubbish football players. The same goes for a large portion of the Open Source / Free Software developer community - many are software developers by trade and make their living doing just that; they also happen to do the same thing for free for the benefit of the community - it doesn't mean the software they produce for free is of any lesser quality than that which they are getting paid to produce. Grant. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:08:45 +0000 From: Neil Greenwood <neil.greenwood.lug@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Research Required To: UK Ubuntu Talk <ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTinV-5FS55soXcUUAL=8ggREo+JAOG4oG8zE7rGh@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 28 December 2010 19:45, Nigel Verity <nigelverity@hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear All > >[snip] > I installed Ubuntu 10.4 LTS. I removed the bottom task bar completely so as > not to complicate matters with the concept of workspaces. You should change the number of workspaces to 1, in case the keyboard shortcuts are accidentally used to change workspaces: "Argh, all my windows suddenly disappeared!" Cofion/Regards, Neil. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:20:11 +0000 From: Colin Law <clanlaw@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Research Required To: UK Ubuntu Talk <ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTi=2vBykQRM-rFaxMaHZsYvzYVr7cth6hHgiB=E+@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 28 December 2010 19:45, Nigel Verity <nigelverity@hotmail.com> wrote: > ... > I installed Ubuntu 10.4 LTS. I removed the bottom task bar completely so as > not to complicate matters with the concept of workspaces. I moved the top > task bar to the bottom of the screen, then added the task list applet so > that open applications would each be represented by a familiar button. I > removed the Firefox and Help icons to complete the Windows look-and-feel as > far as possible. My experience with setting up Windows users with Ubuntu has been that the top and bottom bars have not been an issue. Users are, after all, experienced with application menus and toolbars at the top of windows, which is more or less what the top bar is. I think trying to make it as much like Windows as possible is unnecessary. Better to concentrate on making users aware that they are getting something better, they then expect it to be different, and as long as the operation is logical and simple there will be few problems. If we try to convince users that they are getting a windows clone they may complain about the differences that they will find. If we convince them they are getting something that is better (_and_ free) then they are more likely to accept the differences, or even revel in them. By all means set the workspaces to one to get rid of that complexity though. Colin ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:00:22 +0000 From: Dianne Reuby <pramclub@yahoo.co.uk> Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Desktop backgrounds To: UK Ubuntu Talk <ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <1293620422.2724.9.camel@dianne-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" When I upgraded/installed 10.10, I chose one of the pre-installed desktop backgrounds (a sort of shades-of-blue photo of a pier). A few weeks ago I downloaded a Christmas background. Yesterday I went to change it back, but the pre-installed background I'd used before wasn't there. No probs - I downloaded one I liked from art.gnome. But do the updates change those pre-installed backgrounds? Can't see that they would. Why bother? So where has it gone? Dianne PS I was given a copy of the Ubuntu Linux Toolbox for Christmas - my questions will now be trivial and pointless as I shall be asking the Book all other questions. :) ------------------------------ -- ubuntu-uk mailing list ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk End of ubuntu-uk Digest, Vol 68, Issue 44 *****************************************