<html><body><div>On 02 Sep, 2010,at 08:52 PM, David D Lowe <daviddlowe.flimm@gmail.com> wrote:</div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="_stretch">On 01/09/10 23:52, Tony Pursell wrote:<br> > UK for Ukraine is wrong!<br> ><br> I think there's a misunderstanding. This is what is how I classify things:<br> <br> UK: United Kingdom (the country)<br> uk: Ukrainian (the language)<br> <br> All I wanted was for the UK to be in capitals. That's it. As I have no <br> hope of becoming a dictator, benevolent or otherwise, I'll cheerfully <br> accept the wisdom of the crowd. I definitely prefer UK to GB, as UK is <br> more inclusive.<br> <br> David D Lowe</div></div></blockquote><span> </span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>I voted lower-case on purely typographical grounds.  The upper-case U in</span></div><div><span>the 'ubuntu' font doesn't have the same shape as the lower-case u, so an</span></div><div><span>upper-case UK looked disjoint next to the multiple, distinctive u's in 'ubuntu'.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>If 'ubuntu' in the logo was capitalized, or entirely upper-case, it would have</span></div><div><span>been very different.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>I'd ordinarily go with an upper-case UK on technical grounds, but in a logo</span></div><div><span>that's almost entirely typographical, type considerations are unavoidable.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div>Your position is also entirely valid, I just thought I'd illustrate the other side</div><div>of the fence.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>  Shaun</div><div><br></div></body></html>