> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">Although I have no hard evidence ... the truth is out there.</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; "></span><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;"><br>
</span></font><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; "></span><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">No offense, but by speculating like they do on government's spying in on us through our computers whilst offering no hard evidence, they rather run the risk of coming across a little tin-foil hat.</span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">I don't know the Enquirer -- how respected a journal is it?</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">There are plenty of sound usability, technical, financial, ethical, political, and security-related reasons to both reject M$ & embrace Ubuntu with lots of hard evidence to back them -- so many that I doubt I'll ever get around to worrying on account of article as heavy on paranoia & thin on corroborating facts as that first link!</span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">Interesting second article, though, cheers.</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;"> Doug.<br>
</span></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/10/22 David King <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:linuxman@avoura.com">linuxman@avoura.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Although I have no hard evidence, it was years ago that I heard about<br>
the US govt/FBI having a backdoor into Windows, and that all antivirus<br>
software by law cannot be allowed to detect what the FBI, etc., put onto<br>
people's computers.<br>
<br>
It might be true, it might be partially true. But the fact is that,<br>
AFAIK, this kind of spyware can exist on Windows PCs, but not so much in<br>
Linux.<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1025684/us-government-snoops-used-vista-to-spy-on-me" target="_blank">http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1025684/us-government-snoops-used-vista-to-spy-on-me</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
As for WGA, this is the Windows Genuine Advantage tool, that checks if<br>
the Windows you are using is valid or not, and if not, reports back to<br>
Microsoft. It is a type of spyware which might also be used to report<br>
other information to MS.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39277823,00.htm" target="_blank">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39277823,00.htm</a><br>
<br>
This article suggests that early versions of WGA did report to Microsoft<br>
at every startup time, but later versions were modified not too after<br>
people complained about it.<br>
<br>
At least two of the people who replied to that article wrote that they<br>
switched to linux, and the WGA was one of the main reasons why I<br>
personally decided to return to linux and try to use it full time at home.<br>
<br>
<br>
As in all things, I expect the truth is out there.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
David King<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Alan Pope wrote:<br>
> 2009/10/22 Alan Lord (News) <<a href="mailto:alanslists@gmail.com">alanslists@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
><br>
>> There was a story (poss. last year or earlier) about a FBI(or Police)<br>
>> conference in the US where MS apparently handed out a USB key to all<br>
>> delegates that had "backdoors" into Windows. If I get chance I'll try to<br>
>> search for it.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
> Interesting, I'd not heard about that. Google turned up this:-<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080429/095514977.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080429/095514977.shtml</a><br>
><br>
> "Apparently, they're giving out special USB keys that simply get<br>
> around Microsoft's security, allowing the holder of the key to very<br>
> quickly get forensic information (including internet surfing history),<br>
> passwords and supposedly encrypted data off of a laptop."<br>
><br>
> ...<br>
><br>
> "Update: Some folks in the comments, and Ed Bott, claim that this post<br>
> is a misreading of the original story. The USB key includes a bunch of<br>
> standard tools, not access to a "backdoor." The confusion, on my part,<br>
> was due to the original article claiming that the device "can decrypt<br>
> passwords and analyze a computer's Internet activity, as well as data<br>
> stored in the computer." In saying so, it appeared that the device<br>
> must have access to a backdoor to decrypt the password -- but an<br>
> update claims that it's merely "password security auditing<br>
> technologies.""<br>
><br>
> Which could be achieved with one of many Linux based Live CDs or USB keys:-<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/03/10-best-security-live-cd-distros-pen-test-forensics-recovery/" target="_blank">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/03/10-best-security-live-cd-distros-pen-test-forensics-recovery/</a><br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Al.<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
<a href="mailto:ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk</a><br>
<a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>