<div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/9/28, <a href="mailto:Darren.Mansell@opengi.co.uk">Darren.Mansell@opengi.co.uk</a> <<a href="mailto:Darren.Mansell@opengi.co.uk">Darren.Mansell@opengi.co.uk</a>>:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: <a href="mailto:ubuntu-uk-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com">
ubuntu-uk-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:ubuntu-uk-">ubuntu-uk-</a><br>> <a href="mailto:bounces@lists.ubuntu.com">bounces@lists.ubuntu.com</a>] On Behalf Of Alan Pope<br>> Sent: 28 September 2007 07:35
<br>> To: British Ubuntu Talk<br>> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Video editing<br>><br>> Hi,<br>><br>> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:26 +0200, Sakjur wrote:<br>> > Why don't you use the diffrent advantages of the diffrent editors?
<br>> > Like mix them...<br>> > Is it speciall fileformats for the diffrent editors?<br>><br>> Imagine using 3 different word processors to produce a document. One<br>> because it lets you do bold, one because it does tables and another
<br>> because it saves in the right format. You would have to keep switching<br>> between the applications. It would be incredibly inefficient and<br>> frustrating.<br>><br>> I would love to see just one decent video editor on Linux. There are
<br>> loads on Windows and Mac :(<br>><br>> Cheers,<br>> Al.<br>><br>></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Ohh... yeah... maybe it's a bit hard to use three diffrent... anyway you should use one for the effects and one for the editing.. there's a lot of pro's doing that...</div><br> </div><br>