<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 13/02/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Llywelyn Owen</b> <<a href="mailto:linux@spamtracker.co.uk">linux@spamtracker.co.uk</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
But you may benefit in the long term if they are successful enough to disrupt the status quo<br><br></blockquote></div><br>I can't see myself benefitting from anything that Kodak or SCO or any other failing company turned patent-troll does.
<br><br>My take on it was that they missed the boat of digital cameras and became irrelevant. So in fine US corporate fashion, they extorted money from a "successful" company using the broken patent system.<br><br>
I'm sorry, but I take that kind of behaviour into account when making purchasing decisions.<br><br>This is why I don't do business with Microsoft, Amazon, HP, etc. <br>