[ubuntu-uk] 64 vs 32bit Applications
Liam Proven
lproven at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 13:17:47 UTC 2016
On 1 June 2016 at 12:33, Nigel Verity <nigelverity at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've recently gone over to 64bit Ubuntu versions on all my boxes and this
> raised a question. Does every binary object in the repositories have to be
> compiled twice - once for 32 and again for 64bit architectures - or can
> 32bit compilations run on a 64bit host?
>
> If they are separate versions is there a likelihood that some particularly
> obscure packages will fall by the wayside simply through being considered
> not worth compiling for 64bit? Perhaps there is a formal policy on this.
As a general rule, 64-bit x86 OSes can run 32-bit code. So it is
perfectly possible to run old binaries on a 64-bit OS.
E.g. Microsoft has not updated Skype for Linux in years, and it is
only available as a 32-bit binary, but it still works fine. However,
it requires a whole load of 32-bit libraries to be installed to
support it -- however, they come from the Ubuntu repositories and get
updated along with the rest of the OS.
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)
More information about the ubuntu-uk
mailing list