[ubuntu-uk] Any recommendations for an xhtml editor

kpb kpb at sohcahtoa.org.uk
Sat Jan 5 20:33:58 UTC 2013


Hello Sean

I was replying to Alan Lord, who was suggesting direct editing of xhtml markup. Do you not see the replies in threaded mode? I suggested using a 'light' markup with script based conversion to html and my point was that this reduces the silly errors you get from direct markup.

I do not generally use visual editors, although the page at

http://sohcahtoa.org.uk/pages/probability-vocabulary-and-basics.html

was produced using OpenOffice directly.

cheers

On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 20:18:09 +0000
Sean Miller <sean at seanmiller.net> wrote:

> On 5 January 2013 20:16, Sean Miller <sean at seanmiller.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 5 January 2013 19:28, kpb <kpb at sohcahtoa.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Sean and all
> >>
> >> While Markdown/textile are pretty light, my personal site isn't pretty :-)
> >>
> >> http://sohcahtoa.org.uk/
> >>
> >> (The Llamas are a family joke). The method currently in use is described
> >> here
> >>
> >> http://sohcahtoa.org.uk/pages/publish-a-web-site-with-bash-scripts.html
> >
> >
> > I don't see any WYSIWYG editor in action here at all, yet you said that
> > you used one to produce your "templates".
> >
> > Can you link to a template-based site that you've built using a WYSIWYG
> > editor?
> >
> 
> I'm just interested to see what the code generated by the WYSIWYGs you're
> advocating looks like, not pages generated by your shell script thing which
> is not what the original thread was about.
> 
> I stick with my argument that it is better to learn (X)HTML if one is
> trying to write markup than some third-party "WYSIWYG" where what you see
> will only be what you get on one browser (if you're lucky).
> 
> Sean


-- 
kpb <kpb at sohcahtoa.org.uk>



More information about the ubuntu-uk mailing list