[ubuntu-uk] efi boot, Windows 8 and Linux
Paul Sutton
zleap at zleap.net
Thu Sep 22 08:47:11 UTC 2011
On 22/09/11 09:42, Simon Greenwood wrote:
>
>
> On 22 September 2011 00:06, Alan Bell <alan.bell at libertus.co.uk
> <mailto:alan.bell at libertus.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> On 21/09/11 23:29, Bea Groves wrote:
>
> Just read the following. Comments?
>
> yeah, it is potentially very nasty.
> To be Windows 8 certified computers will have to be able to do
> this secure boot thing. Most will include an option to turn it
> off, exactly like the google chromebooks do, they have a switch to
> turn off the code signing requirement so you can run unsigned
> operating systems. The OLPC also has this exact same feature, but
> you can get a dev key and turn it off.
> The problem is that some manufacturers might start not bothering
> to include an off switch. So that would creep in as a set of
> machines (probably quite mainstream high volume ones) that won't
> run anything but the pre-installed Windows 8 or above.
> The big problem is that Windows 9 might *require* secure boot to
> run. This means it won't run on older machines (driving hardware
> sales, the industry likes that) and means that more manufacturers
> will fail to include an off switch for the secure boot. If the
> market doesn't punish them by people avoiding these pre-bricked
> computers then they will keep doing it. Microsoft will carefully
> not require OEMs to fail to include an off switch, because that
> would be anti-competitive. Virtualbox and VMware and so on can
> include the public keys and provide a secure boot environment, or
> run unsigned code for developing drivers and running Linux, but
> you won't be running Linux on the hardware, only virtualised. It
> is kind of like the current trend for using up 4 primary
> partitions and not creating extended partitions to make dual
> booting harder, but this one you potentially can't get round. I
> can see a time when you have to get a laptop chipped to run Linux
> like you would a DVD player to do multi region.
>
>
> There are current factors that may give hope: for the one the major
> component makers such as Samsung and LG are proving to be less OS
> bound than previously, certainly in the mobile phone sector: all the
> Korean companies produce both Android and Windows phones as well as
> making their own OSes such as Samsung's Bada, so may be less willing
> to bind themselves to Windows for their PCs, perhaps more so if the
> X86 Android port is successful, becomes official and remains free.
>
> On the other hand, the success of the iPad and other tablets has
> blurred the distinction between PC and phone and the tablet-type
> device may supersede the PC more in the coming years, something which
> Microsoft have seen and responded to by finally porting Windows to
> ARM, something which Unity is intended also to address. The
> traditional PC may end up playing a smaller role in the hardware
> ecosystem than it has previously.
>
> As Alan says, in the short term though, Linux will have to adapt to
> EFI (Macs have had this since the switch to x86 and you can run Linux
> on them with few problems) but if the time comes that signing becomes
> necessary, the growth of Linux may be such that it can't be ignored as
> an alternative desktop and that there will a key pair or pairs available.
>
> s/
> --
> Twitter: @sfgreenwood
> "Is this your sanderling?"
>
We would have to do a lot of awareness raising and support things like
install days to get round things like this. as the borg say "we will
adapt"
paul
--
Paul Sutton Cert SLPS (Open)
http://www.zleap.net
17th September 2011 - Software freedom day
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-uk/attachments/20110922/8bbb7a4c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ubuntu-uk
mailing list