[ubuntu-uk] apt-get update / apt-get upgrade question

Anton Piatek anton at piatek.co.uk
Fri Sep 3 17:16:42 BST 2010


Upgrade ignores some packages and dost-upgrade tries to do more.

Aptitude is often said to be better and supports safe-upgrade and
full-upgrade as the equivalents to the above apt-get commands. Aptitude is
said to have a better dependency resolution algorithm.

Anton

On 3 Sep 2010 13:44, "Mark Fraser" <ubuntu at mfraz.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
> On Friday 03 Sep 2010 10:12:23 Alan Pope wrote:
>> On 3 September 2010 10:09, Steve Fisher <xirconuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am a Mandriva refugee! I know rpm inside out, but not apt. When I
>> > issue the above, sometimes I see e.g.:
>> > 26 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 132 not upgraded. (KDE
>> > updates coming down).
>> > If I use the gui or synaptic, it will let me update fully. Why won't it
>> > do it from a terminal?
>>
>> It will if you use the right command :)
>>
>> sudo apt-get update
>> sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
>>
>> If you do "sudo apt-get upgrade" then it wont upgrade any packages
>> that are dependant on something you don't currently have installed
>> (i.e. a new dependency). a 'dist-upgrade' will install those
>> additional packages.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Al.
>
> I usually do
> sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
> but that doens't always work. Just now I was told that something like 130
> updates were held back so I had to use aptitude full-upgrade instead which

> pulled in a couple more dependancies.
>
> --
> Registered Linux User #466407 http://counter.li.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-uk/attachments/20100903/47222178/attachment.htm 


More information about the ubuntu-uk mailing list