[ubuntu-uk] 11.04 Natty Narwhal

[Philip Stubbs]

On 18 August 2010 10:08, Alan Pope <alan at popey.com> wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 09:53, Sean Miller <sean at seanmiller.net> wrote:
>> There is no evidence, as far as I can see, that 9.04 and 9.10 are any
>> more similar than 9.10 and 10.04, therefore the "accepted" rules
>> regarding "release numbers" (ie. 1.4 1.41 1.42 1.5 1.51 1.52 denotes
>> major and minor releases) don't apply so 10.04 is NOT a "release
>> number" imho and has no more significance in that regard than "Lucid"
>> or "Karmic"...
>>
>
> Release numbers are arbitrary at the behest of the developer who
> chooses them. We chose YY.DD and it works really well. You can te

And I always thought that it was YY.MM :-)

-- 
Philip Stubbs