Call for testing: Xenial langpack updates IV

[Lukasz Zemczak]

That doesn't sound good at all. The packages that have been published
to -proposed have been copied from the langpack PPA, so I'd expect
those to have sane contents (sanity tested by translators) - but maybe
there's actually no one using those in reality. I'll look into this
tomorrow. Thanks for the heads up!

Cheers,

On 10 July 2018 at 23:01, Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> I started the test for Swedish, but found that something is very wrong. Many
> .mo files, which ought to be present in the language-pack-gnome-sv package,
> are absent, resulting in an untranslated desktop to a large extent. Please
> see the attached file for a simple comparison between the package in
> xenial-updates and the one in xenial-proposed.
>
> Can't tell if all languages are affected by this, but from a quick glance at
> the French equivalent package, it looks like it's not only Swedish.
>
> Since the -base packages have not been updated, there must not be any
> occurrences of "Only in language-pack-gnome-sv_16.04+20171210..." in the
> diff, but there are quite a few of those.
>
> @Łukasz: Please check out what happened.
>
> To everybody else: It's probably best to wait with testing for now.
>
>
> --
> Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj



-- 
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
 Foundations Team
 lukasz.zemczak at canonical.com
 www.canonical.com