<div dir="ltr"><font size="4"><b>A lire<br>A méditer<br>...<br>A espérer pouvoir donner de telles arguments à notre Etat ;)</b></font><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Brett Smith</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brett@fsf.org">brett@fsf.org</a>></span><br>
Date: 2010/3/25<br>Subject: [FSF] FSF Advocates Free Software for U.S. IPEC Joint Strategic Plan<br>To: <a href="mailto:info-fsf@gnu.org">info-fsf@gnu.org</a><br><br><br>BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA -- Thursday, March 25, 2010 -- The Free<br>
Software Foundation (FSF) has responded to the United States executive<br>
Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC) Joint Strategic<br>
Plan.<br>
<br>
The FSF argues that the government should use free software to provide<br>
more freedom and transparency to its constituents and reduce the need<br>
to engage in costly copyright enforcement activities on behalf of<br>
proprietary software companies. The FSF states that "the most<br>
egregious harms to the public interest in the areas of copyright and<br>
patents come not from a lack of enforcement, but from extraordinarily<br>
excessive enforcement."<br>
<br>
"For a government that's supposed to be accountable to its citizens,<br>
it's clear that using free software should be a natural choice," said<br>
Brett Smith, license compliance engineer at the FSF. "With free<br>
software, government can be sure their computers work on behalf of the<br>
people, instead of some proprietary software company. And it also<br>
offers an opportunity for unparalleled transparency: agencies can<br>
release the source code of software they use to help illustrate what<br>
they're doing."<br>
<br>
The creation of IPEC and the Joint Strategic Plan are mandated by the<br>
"PRO-IP Act," which became law in 2008. The Joint Strategic Plan is<br>
intended to provide broad policy recommendations to increase<br>
enforcement of copyright, patent, trademark, and anti-counterfeiting<br>
laws both at home and abroad.<br>
<br>
"Everything about the PRO-IP Act, from the confused way it lumps<br>
together various laws under the banner of 'intellectual property' in<br>
its name, to its corrupted purpose of being another government<br>
giveaway to the big incumbent copyright industries, is flawed" said<br>
Peter Brown, executive director of the FSF. "It's unfair for<br>
taxpayers to foot the bill for supporting the unethical business<br>
models of a handful of companies. Our comment shows there's another<br>
way: with relatively small steps, government can do the right thing<br>
and use free software, make a better investment in our society, and<br>
eliminate much of the need for enforcement of these laws."<br>
<br>
The full text of the FSF's comment is available at<br>
<<a href="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-opposes-more-copyright-enforcement-in-joint-strategic-plan" target="_blank">http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-opposes-more-copyright-enforcement-in-joint-strategic-plan</a>>.<br>
<br>
### About the Free Software Foundation<br>
<br>
The Free Software Foundation, founded in 1985, is dedicated to<br>
promoting computer users' right to use, study, copy, modify, and<br>
redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and<br>
use of free (as in freedom) software -- particularly the GNU operating<br>
system and its GNU/Linux variants -- and free documentation for free<br>
software. The FSF also helps to spread awareness of the ethical and<br>
political issues of freedom in the use of software, and its Web sites,<br>
located at <a href="http://fsf.org" target="_blank">fsf.org</a> and <a href="http://gnu.org" target="_blank">gnu.org</a>, are an important source of information<br>
about GNU/Linux. Donations to support the FSF's work can be made at<br>
<<a href="http://donate.fsf.org" target="_blank">http://donate.fsf.org</a>>. Its headquarters are in Boston, MA, USA.<br>
<br>
### About Free Software and Open Source<br>
<br>
The free software movement's goal is freedom for computer users. Some,<br>
especially corporations, advocate a different viewpoint, known as<br>
"open source," which cites only practical goals such as making<br>
software powerful and reliable, focuses on development models, and<br>
avoids discussion of ethics and freedom. These two viewpoints are<br>
different at the deepest level. For more explanation, see<br>
<<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html" target="_blank">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html</a>>.<br>
<br>
### Media Contacts<br>
<br>
Brett Smith<br>
License Compliance Engineer<br>
Free Software Foundation<br>
+1 (617) 542 5942 x18<br>
<<a href="mailto:brett@fsf.org">brett@fsf.org</a>><br>
<br>
###<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
info-fsf mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:info-fsf@gnu.org">info-fsf@gnu.org</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-fsf" target="_blank">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-fsf</a><br>
</div><br></div>