Package conflict

Edward Cherlin echerlin at
Tue Jul 13 03:10:03 BST 2010

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 20:14, David Farning <dfarning at> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Luke Faraone <luke at> wrote:
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 07/12/2010 05:10 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>>> Apparently the
>>> sugar-activities package does not contain the data needed to identify
>>> the conflict at the time of package selection.
>> The fix for this would be to have sugar-activities Conflict and Replace
>> the sugar-*-activities it contains in the debian/control file. Let me
>> know if you want me to handle it, David.
> Manu has asked Dipankar to look at it.  Would be great if you could
> explain what is happening and how to fix it.
> I expect that we will stumble across this quite frequently over the
> next couple months.  ie xoirc being rename irc ....

We have only a modest number of Ubuntu sugar activities where this
conflict can arise. Is there a place where our packaging process is
documented, so that this can be added to the workflow?

> david

Edward Mokurai (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) Cherlin
Silent Thunder is my name, and Children are my nation.
The Cosmos is my dwelling place, the Truth my destination.

More information about the Ubuntu-sugarteam mailing list