[Bug 567819] Re: Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid

[Luke Faraone]

So, would it be acceptable if pyjamas was shipped in Lucid but without
pyjamas-desktop? This seems like the easiest solution to implement. For
Maverick, we can either continue to do that, have it use WebKit, or get
python-xpcom supported, but the latter two are outside my realm of
expertise.

-- 
Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567819
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sugar
Team, which is subscribed to sugar-hulahop in ubuntu.

Status in “pyjamas” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sugar-browse-activity-0.86” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sugar-hulahop” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “xulrunner-1.9.1” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released

Bug description:
Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9.1

See:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-new-firefox-support-model

sugar-hulahop depends on python-xpcom, which was removed from xulrunner in 1.9.2 and distributed separately. There's a chance that we will package that separately in maverick and reintroduce these packages, but, for the time being it has to go (along with anything that depends on it)