<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Gustin Johnson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gustin@echostar.ca">gustin@echostar.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im"> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Gustin Johnson <<a href="mailto:gustin@echostar.ca">gustin@echostar.ca</a><br> </div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:gustin@echostar.ca">gustin@echostar.ca</a>>> wrote:<br> ><br> > I completely disagree. I for one do notice a difference between 3 GiB<br> > of RAM and 8 GiB of RAM, especially on my DAW.<br> ><br> ><br> > That's the *only* advantage. If you can do without that much RAM, than<br> > by all means use 32bit. 64bit is a mess.<br> ><br> </div>That is a pretty big advantage. I could do without that RAM, but I<br> would not want to. I *could* use a 386 with 4MiB of RAM and still get a<br> lot of work done, it just does not make sense to do so.</blockquote><div><br>A lot of people don't have more than 4gb. And even more do *not* have any use for more than 2gb.<br> <br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Change is uncomfortable, but it will always occur, it<br> is a good idea to get used to it.<br></blockquote></div><br>Exactly. And, as always, early adopters suffer.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Christopher Stamper<br><br>Email: <a href="mailto:christopherstamper@gmail.com">christopherstamper@gmail.com</a><br> Web: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg">http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg</a><br>gTalk: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6e359r">http://tinyurl.com/6e359r</a><br>Skype: cdstamper<br>