Kernel update dependency issue
Set Hallstrom
sakrecoer at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 13:50:05 UTC 2012
Forgive me if I'm off-side by interacting on this. No bad feeling involved.
I am far from Ralf's level, but I think i understand him in this case. I
do use a bootloader that grub wrote for me. Having this said,
uninstalling grub rendered boot-up about 20 times faster. I realised
this as i got fed up of constantly getting software updates from grub.
The difference in startup speed is quite remarquable.
Now, perhaps i am missing something? Is there any good reason to keep
grub once the bootloader is written? I used grub in the first place
because my bootlaoder was corrupt after installing from the live DVDiso
on a usb stick.
Have a good awaketime all!
*set
On 11/06/2012 02:26 PM, Andrew Huys wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2012 08:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:00:50 +0200
>> Janne Jokitalo <astraljava at kapsi.fi> wrote:
>>
>>> $ sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends
>>>
>>> ...will get you where you want.
>> Thank you :)
>>
> Ralph-
> Just wondering why you don't want to use a bootloader?
>
>
>
>
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users
mailing list