New to this list -

[Melvin Ray Herr]

Ralf,

Can you explain why you think Ardour 3's implementation of MIDI is a little
bit bizarre? I.E. do you think there are some features missing or is it
hard to use? Please explain... I'm wondering because a lot of people really
seem to like it.

-MRH
On May 31, 2012 5:09 AM, "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 08:56 +0200, bart deruyter wrote:
> > That means a midi and audio capable DAW.
> >
> > All of it in Ardour?
>
> Ardour2 is for audio only and Ardour 3 for audio and MIDI. While Ardour2
> is the best software for audio, Ardour3 for MIDI still has got serious
> lacks. I'm an old school MIDI user from the 80's, for MIDI (with less
> audio) I recommend to use Qtractor.
>
> > That's new to me, well, with Ardour 3 yes, but without a printable
> > score. The official release isn't out yet... it's still beta. It has
> > midi support though.
>
> Dunno which Linux app is the best to print scores, but Rosegarden is for
> audio, MIDI and MIDI score and perhaps one of the most used
> "sequencers".
>
> > Rosegarden does it all, and with a score. But I'm not a fan of it... I
> > had too many issues with it, but it might work out well for you.
>
> +1
>
> > My guess is, wait for Ardour 3 to release a stable version, download,
> > install (installer is really easy) and try it out. Then you'll have a
> > audio/midi recording app of huge quality.
>
> IMO at the moment the way MIDI is implemented is a little bit bizarre.
>
> - Ralf
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20120531/0e2b3ea3/attachment.html>