Version update from 10.10 to 11.04 - Is it better to re-build the kernel-rt?
Ralf
ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Wed May 4 12:23:41 UTC 2011
After a version upgrade, would it be better to re-build the kernel-rt or
is using the kernels I build with Maverick ok? What's about a self-build
jackd from svn etc.?
Hm? 495 new packages? Order of packages isn't sorted by the alphabet,
hence it's hard to check for issues. The proprietary nvidia driver is
removed, so I expect Ubuntu not to startup (kernel-generic) after the
update, regarding to:
$ cat /etc/rcS.d/S69*
#! /bin/sh
# /etc/rcS.d/Switch_xorg_conf
rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf
case $(uname -r) in
*rt*)
cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nv /etc/X11/xorg.conf
;;
*)
cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia /etc/X11/xorg.conf
;;
esac
I also wonder what will happen to pulseaudio and envy24 tweaks, my
desktop theme etc..
No longer supported by Canonical (8)
libgnome2-perl
docbook-xsl-doc-html
hal-info
libhal1
hal
libhal-storage1
phonon-backend-xine
smartdimmer
Remove (7)
git1.0-glib-2.0
libpolkit-qt-1-0
libmarblewidget10
gnome-user-guide-de
gnome-user-guide-en
libgirespository1.0-1
libdrm-nouveau1
No longer needed (15)
libwebkit-1.0-common
libqtscript4-phonon
libavformat52
openoffice.org-style-human
libwebkit-1.0-2
libgladeui-1-9
libswscale0
libavutil50
openoffice.org-core
libindicator1
libimobiledevice1
openoffice.org-base-core
nvidia-current-modaliases
nvidia-1773-modaliases
libavcodec52
Install (495)
[snip]
Upgrade (1655)
[snip]
Of cause there're two backups and one is brand-new:
$ ls edubuntu*tar.gz -hl
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.6G 2011-04-14 12:58
edubuntu_maverick_apr-14-2011.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.7G 2011-05-04 10:45
edubuntu_maverick_may-04-2011_stable_midi_daw.tar.gz
;) Ralf
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users
mailing list