recording vocals

[Gustin Johnson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christopher Stamper wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Gustin Johnson <gustin at echostar.ca
> <mailto:gustin at echostar.ca>> wrote:
> 
>     I completely disagree.  I for one do notice a difference between 3 GiB
>     of RAM and 8 GiB of RAM, especially on my DAW. 
> 
> 
> That's the *only* advantage. If you can do without that much RAM, than
> by all means use 32bit. 64bit is a mess.
> 
That is a pretty big advantage.  I could do without that RAM, but I
would not want to.  I *could* use a 386 with 4MiB of RAM and still get a
lot of work done, it just does not make sense to do so.

I am no expert but my perception was this transition was less painful
than the 16 bit to 32 bit transition.  We knew the switch to 64bit would
happen in our lifetime back then, so I don't see this perceived scam.
It was always going to happen.  Technology advances, and not always
without pain.  This was true 20 years ago and I expect it to be true 20
years from now.  Change is uncomfortable, but it will always occur, it
is a good idea to get used to it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrOffQACgkQwRXgH3rKGfP6IQCgoqDFufSWgjR9Ge+YAiAe8fda
LMUAn3VfFfxZ3+ZwP+62OI695nExWCNd
=HbGK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----