recording vocals

beejunk at gmail.com beejunk at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 16:49:53 BST 2009


On Oct 8, 2009 9:50am, Andrew Oikle <aoikle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Stick to 32 bit for audio. 64 bit has absolutely zero benefit for  
> recording. Benchmarks show that in some cases 64 bit can underperform 32  
> bit and it's only beneficial to extreme number crunching scientists that  
> need that level of precision, and also for gigantic databases. Selling 64  
> bit processors to consumers was a scam to trick people into upgrading  
> their computers... again. I repeat, 64 bit has practically no use for  
> consumer use or audio recording. Does anyone here disagree?

> Andrew
> Austin, TX


I'm not too familiar with some of the technical details, but I believe you  
are correct in saying that, at this point, 64-bit seems largely useless to  
the average user, particularly as far as audio goes.

When it comes to versions of Ubuntu, I have personally found that Hardy is  
far and away the most stable and efficient OS of the current Ubuntu  
releases. This applies to my computer, though, and your mileage may vary. I  
am looking forward to Karmic, and hope that it solves some of the many  
problems I've been having with the Jaunty RT kernel (and, no, I do not know  
how to compile my own kernels. Maybe one day).

Jason, as for a good set-up that gives you no noise, if you're going to  
need to buy some kind of pre-amp/DI or audio-interface as well as a mic,  
you will have a hard time keeping it under $200. But it is possible. When I  
first started recording, I used a very cheap $60 Behringer mixer (which  
came with two channels that could be used as pre-amps, and phantom power  
which I did not need at the time.) and a used $50 EV dynamic mic. I ran the  
mic into the mixer, and then ran the mixer's RCA tape-out direclty into my  
computer's on-board soundcard, using an RCA to 1/8" cable. Whenever I  
listen back to those recordings, I am actually surprised that they sound  
fairly decent. I guess the moral of this story is that $200 won't get you  
anything 'nice', but it should get you something that will work, and  
probably fairly well.

By the way, what equipment do you have right now? That will help in coming  
up with recommendations for what to get.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20091008/f0a6bc89/attachment.htm 


More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list