FW: Re: 8.10 & rt kernel?
laurent.bellegarde at free.fr
Fri Mar 20 06:15:48 GMT 2009
Gustin Johnson a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> mac wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 07:19 -0400, suemac at empire.net wrote:
>>> Original Message: ----------------- From: Gustin Johnson
>>> gustin at echostar.ca Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:33:48 -0600 To:
>>> suemac at empire.net, ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com Subject:
>>> Re: 8.10 & rt kernel?
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>> suemac at empire.net wrote:
>>>> I updated to 8.10 64bit & rt kernel last eve.
>>> Which kernel specifically?
>>> uname -a
>> 2.6.27-3-rt #1 PREEMPT RT Mon Oct 27 03:02:33 UTC 2008 x86_64
> The 2.6.27 series has issues and IMO should be considered broken. I am
> using a custom 2.6.28 and the 64Studio people are getting some promising
> results from a 2.6.29 RC. Time is getting tight for 9.04, but the
> situation is much better than the fall when we were this far from the
> 8.10 release.
> FYI there are patches for 2.6.29-rc8 at:
> I will be building my own 2.6.29 this weekend, time permitting. I could
> post a .deb if you were interested. I need a task to burn in my new
> laptop :)
as i'm writting the book "free audio-video editing" here in France, i'm
having a talk with 64studio users and one told me yesterday that under
64studio beta 3 he has got this
Linux kernel 2.6.29-1-multimedia-686
Ardour 2.7.1-2 Hardy1
Rosegarden 1.7.3-1 Hardy1
working fine for audio production, 64studio is based on hardy to use the
LTS support the longer they can.
If i understand, they have made a kernel RT like hardy's one, stable and
powerfull, but closest from jaunty'one...
Hope it helps
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users