About MuseScore
rolodoom
rolodoom at gmail.com
Sat Jan 10 07:43:14 GMT 2009
Hello y'all
Ok, I'm trying out MuseScore and been searching a while and haven't
found a solution.
1. Can't get sound from MuseScore. I tried the enable sf2 synth using
alsa but anything. Haven't tried out jack 'cause haven't learn hoe to
use it yet
2. where is the instrument list? I would like to add some local
instruments to the score. I check preferences and it says
":/data/instruments.xml" but don't know where the f* that path is
I'm been writing on it and it's cool, but would be nice to enable playback.
Any help would be appreciated
RoLo
ubuntu-studio-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com wrote:
> Send Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list submissions to
> ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ubuntu-studio-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ubuntu-studio-users-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-Studio-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Echoaudio audiofire12 success? (Gustin Johnson)
> 2. Re: UBUNTU Studio 64bit or 32bit rt (Gustin Johnson)
> 3. Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment (Hartmut Noack)
> 4. Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment (Gustin Johnson)
> 5. The future of backporting (Khashayar Naderehvandi)
> 6. RE: The future of backporting (Gregory Boehnlein)
> 7. Re: The future of backporting (Scott)
> 8. Re: The future of backporting (laurent.bellegarde)
> 9. Re: The future of backporting (Pietro Bergamo)
> 10. Re: The future of backporting (Fabien Juchniewicz)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:53:58 -0700
> From: Gustin Johnson <gustin at echostar.ca>
> Subject: Re: Echoaudio audiofire12 success?
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49664BC6.5040707 at echostar.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Scott wrote:
> <snip>
>
>> I've googled these errors to death. Based on my report above can anyone
>> help narrow down the scope of my problem?
>>
>>
> I would start here:
> http://www.ffado.org/?q=documentation
>
> Also the 2.6.27 kernel has known issues with real time. This is expected
> to improve in the near future, but for now most of use have stayed at
> Ubuntu Studio 8.04
>
> Hth,
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklmS8YACgkQwRXgH3rKGfP/AwCdGpSZk6JU37OZTfogSTa4oqqu
> uX8An1OqzlbzN76EEjLhHM2HDvbmE2wO
> =diaR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:09:53 -0700
> From: Gustin Johnson <gustin at echostar.ca>
> Subject: Re: UBUNTU Studio 64bit or 32bit rt
> To: suemac at empire.net, Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49664F81.2030002 at echostar.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> suemac at empire.net wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just curious here.
>>
>> I currently have the 64bit version of Ubuntu Studio 8.10 loaded on my
>> laptop.
>>
>> Jack gets XRUNs regularly with freebob. No other apps running just freebob
>> connected to my FP10.
>>
>> I don't remember this being the case with 8.04 and the rt kernel.
>>
>> Since I haven't heard anything about an rt version of 8.10 (will there also
>> be a delay with 64bit rt?) on the horizon...
>>
>>
> This is a known issue. It depends on the rt patch for 2.6.28
> There should not be a time difference between 32 and 64 bit on x86
> processors.
>
>
>> - Is it possible to eliminate the XRUNs in the 64bit version without rt
>> kernel?
>>
>>
> Increase periods and buffers. Of course this also increases latency.
>
>
>> - If I want to do live recording should I just go back to 8.04?
>>
>>
> You could also build a 2.6.24 with the RT25 patch. The easiest thing to
> do is to go back to 8.04.
>
>
>> Different issue:
>>
>> - Does anyone know how to get the on board sound devices to show up in
>> Jack, WHILE freebob is in use? (After much research in the forums, getting
>> no response from either the JACK or Pulseaudio forums/irc channels, and
>> lots of tinkering I've been unable to find the secret...if it exists.)
>>
>
> I do not have a definitive answer, but I was pretty sure that you could
> only use one device at a time with jack.
>
> If there is a way to do it, I have not heard of it.
>
>> - Is there a way to configure the JACK freebob settings for low latency and
>> no XRUNs.
>>
>
> Probably a good idea to look here:
> http://www.ffado.org/?q=documentation
>
> Low latency AND no XRUNS pretty much depends on an RT kernel.
>
>
> Hth,
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklmT4EACgkQwRXgH3rKGfPSjQCglEujLtVqPeHlN2joxSVmkijQ
> aYEAnj8Do6bHIzqQ4DXWj7Xgp1xq0rfa
> =dvPk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:22:57 +0100
> From: Hartmut Noack <zettberlin at linuxuse.de>
> Subject: Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49666EB1.4040805 at linuxuse.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> aYo Binitie schrieb:
>
>> I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to
>> upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both
>> interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you
>> have found buggy with Intrepid
>>
>>
> - KDE4.1 is experimental at best and it is the ONLY option, no way to
> install KDE35 parallel.
>
> - The Presonus Firebox (FW-audio) that runs perfectly smooth in 64Studio
> and very well in Suse/JAD is not usable.
>
> - Neither xine nor pulseaudio are provided with their jackd-plugins - at
> least xine can work perfectly well with jackd since years....
>
> - The KDE3 delivered with 7.10 was able to export my desktop perfectly
> well to the VGA-out of my Laptop, in Intrepid no WM can zoome the output
> correctly...
>
> - 7.10 supported my NOKIA-Mobile plug/play, Intrepid does not even see it.
>
> in short: I dont think, there is a Ubuntu Studio 8.10 - I only hope for
> 9.04 to make things better....
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:46:11 -0700
> From: Gustin Johnson <gustin at echostar.ca>
> Subject: Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49667423.1010905 at echostar.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hartmut Noack wrote:
>
>> aYo Binitie schrieb:
>>
>>> I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to
>>> upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both
>>> interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you
>>> have found buggy with Intrepid
>>>
>>>
>> - KDE4.1 is experimental at best and it is the ONLY option, no way to
>> install KDE35 parallel.
>>
>> - The Presonus Firebox (FW-audio) that runs perfectly smooth in 64Studio
>> and very well in Suse/JAD is not usable.
>>
>> - Neither xine nor pulseaudio are provided with their jackd-plugins - at
>> least xine can work perfectly well with jackd since years....
>>
>> - The KDE3 delivered with 7.10 was able to export my desktop perfectly
>> well to the VGA-out of my Laptop, in Intrepid no WM can zoome the output
>> correctly...
>>
>> - 7.10 supported my NOKIA-Mobile plug/play, Intrepid does not even see it.
>>
>> in short: I dont think, there is a Ubuntu Studio 8.10 - I only hope for
>> 9.04 to make things better....
>>
>>
>
> You forgot to mention the lack of a real time kernel :)
>
> Also, I have two laptops that 8.10 seemed to break wireless. Both
> laptops have Intel adaptors (a 4965 in my netbook and 3945 in the
> Latitude). Building my own 2.6.28 resolved the issue.
>
> 8.10 is much better with KDE4.2, but you need to add an *unsupported*
> PPA apt source. Also 4.2 is even more bleeding edge. 3.5.x is MIA, and
> it would have been nice to have alongside the 4.x branch given the Beta
> nature of 4.x
>
> For Studio work 8.04 is really the only choice. Even on the Desktop, I
> see no compelling reason to move to 8.10
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklmdCMACgkQwRXgH3rKGfPYVgCdEyJfwxqk1N0/hYhaeJ1gzjlm
> xW4AoJrF1Er3UWP3jn9m13Y88R0mm737
> =DCnq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:23:26 +0100
> From: "Khashayar Naderehvandi" <khashayar.lists at gmail.com>
> Subject: The future of backporting
> To: "Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion"
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID:
> <fca60f3a0901081623y5d604b56u99c9b72409cef7fa at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have joined the Studio -dev team in the hope that I will eventually
> become a dedicated backporter of core Ubuntu Studio applications. If
> all goes well, I will make sure that the latest upstream releases of
> these applications are packaged for the current development branch of
> Ubuntu, and that some of them are backported to the released and
> supported branches (namely hardy and intrepid at the moment).
>
> On our next meeting, one of the topics will be precisely this: Which
> applications are most important to have backported.
>
> With this email, I would like to ask the community for your input.
> Which packages matter? Which packages would you like to see
> backported? Which packages do you *need* to see backported? Are there
> any packages that you altogether miss from the archives? Is there
> anything else you'd like to comment on related to packaging?
>
> Please reply as soon as you can.
>
> All the best,
> Khashayar
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:28:42 -0500
> From: "Gregory Boehnlein" <damin at nacs.net>
> Subject: RE: The future of backporting
> To: "'Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion'"
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <014101c971f1$39efbe80$adcf3b80$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have joined the Studio -dev team in the hope that I will eventually
>> become a dedicated backporter of core Ubuntu Studio applications. If
>> all goes well, I will make sure that the latest upstream releases of
>> these applications are packaged for the current development branch of
>> Ubuntu, and that some of them are backported to the released and
>> supported branches (namely hardy and intrepid at the moment).
>>
>> On our next meeting, one of the topics will be precisely this: Which
>> applications are most important to have backported.
>>
>> With this email, I would like to ask the community for your input.
>> Which packages matter? Which packages would you like to see
>> backported? Which packages do you *need* to see backported? Are there
>> any packages that you altogether miss from the archives? Is there
>> anything else you'd like to comment on related to packaging?
>>
>> Please reply as soon as you can.
>>
>
> I'll put a vote in for the latest Ardour, Jack and Alsa drivers!
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:30:24 -0800
> From: Scott <ubuntustudio at troutpocket.org>
> Subject: Re: The future of backporting
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <4966B6C0.2000501 at troutpocket.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
>
>> I'll put a vote in for the latest Ardour, Jack and Alsa drivers!
>>
>
> I'll second your votes! I only installed this version to use Ardour connected to a
> firewire audio recording device (Echo Audio AF12).
>
> -Scott
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:16:44 +0100
> From: "laurent.bellegarde" <laurent.bellegarde at free.fr>
> Subject: Re: The future of backporting
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <4966EBCC.1070203 at free.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Khashayar Naderehvandi a ?crit :
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have joined the Studio -dev team in the hope that I will eventually
>> become a dedicated backporter of core Ubuntu Studio applications. If
>> all goes well, I will make sure that the latest upstream releases of
>> these applications are packaged for the current development branch of
>> Ubuntu, and that some of them are backported to the released and
>> supported branches (namely hardy and intrepid at the moment).
>>
>> On our next meeting, one of the topics will be precisely this: Which
>> applications are most important to have backported.
>>
>> With this email, I would like to ask the community for your input.
>> Which packages matter? Which packages would you like to see
>> backported? Which packages do you *need* to see backported? Are there
>> any packages that you altogether miss from the archives? Is there
>> anything else you'd like to comment on related to packaging?
>>
>> Please reply as soon as you can.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Khashayar
>>
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> congratulations for the future work.
>
> in www.lprod.org project, video editing for newbies, we try to improve
> support for multimedia software...
>
> to improved video editing,
>
> In ubuntu 8.04, we left kdenlive 0.7, it seems to be done in 8.10
> in 8.04 and 8.10, last release of kino, dvgrab.
> In 8.04, we need also a newer ffmpeg release to improve avchd support,
> h264 AVC encoding for hard disk, memory card, dvd HD camrecorder
> in 8.04, we need lastest release of mpalyer/mencoder
> In 8.04, we need the lastest openmovie editor
>
>
> in 8.04 and in 8.10, we can't install and use jashaka 2.0 (maybe 3.0 has
> release) since dapper, no one has done the backport, large left for
> video special effects under GNU/Linux
>
> in 8.04 and in 8.10, we left to smile (old name manslide) in deb package.
>
> Many works, if you could do only one, the most important is ffmpeg
> lastest release for avchd support.
>
> Thanks and bye,
>
> Laurent from France.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:20:33 -0200
> From: Pietro Bergamo <bergamopietro at yahoo.com.br>
> Subject: Re: The future of backporting
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <1231525233.6423.4.camel at Ubuntu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Em Sex, 2009-01-09 ?s 01:23 +0100, Khashayar Naderehvandi escreveu:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have joined the Studio -dev team in the hope that I will eventually
>> become a dedicated backporter of core Ubuntu Studio applications. If
>> all goes well, I will make sure that the latest upstream releases of
>> these applications are packaged for the current development branch of
>> Ubuntu, and that some of them are backported to the released and
>> supported branches (namely hardy and intrepid at the moment).
>>
>> On our next meeting, one of the topics will be precisely this: Which
>> applications are most important to have backported.
>>
>> With this email, I would like to ask the community for your input.
>> Which packages matter? Which packages would you like to see
>> backported? Which packages do you *need* to see backported? Are there
>> any packages that you altogether miss from the archives? Is there
>> anything else you'd like to comment on related to packaging?
>>
>> Please reply as soon as you can.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Khashayar
>>
>>
>
> I would like to have the latest Pure Data with externals.
> Congratulations for your initiative and to all at the Ubuntu Studio
> team,
> Pietro
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:54:32 +0100
> From: Fabien Juchniewicz <fabien at juchniewicz.eu>
> Subject: Re: The future of backporting
> To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion
> <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <200901092054.33009.fabien at juchniewicz.eu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Le Friday 09 January 2009 01:23:26 Khashayar Naderehvandi, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have joined the Studio -dev team in the hope that I will eventually
>> become a dedicated backporter of core Ubuntu Studio applications. If
>> all goes well, I will make sure that the latest upstream releases of
>> these applications are packaged for the current development branch of
>> Ubuntu, and that some of them are backported to the released and
>> supported branches (namely hardy and intrepid at the moment).
>>
>> On our next meeting, one of the topics will be precisely this: Which
>> applications are most important to have backported.
>>
>> With this email, I would like to ask the community for your input.
>> Which packages matter? Which packages would you like to see
>> backported? Which packages do you *need* to see backported? Are there
>> any packages that you altogether miss from the archives? Is there
>> anything else you'd like to comment on related to packaging?
>>
>> Please reply as soon as you can.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Khashayar
>>
>
> All,
>
> Here you may find good Hardy backported packages :
> http://ubuntufromscratch.wordpress.com/
>
> My 0.02?
>
> /Fabien
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20090109/dd539a3a/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users
mailing list