Dssi-Vst and Ubuntu Studio
allornothin.tommy at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 18:51:25 GMT 2009
If I understand correctly, you cannot ship/distribute with vst functionality
as the person who has the site/server could be liable but you can distribute
source and debs and let people build or install it after the fact without
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Sergio Bello <s.bello at sintechno.it> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 17:17 +0100, sandie wrote:
> > Sergio Bello wrote:
> > > I don't know about lmms VsTIge, but probably it's a reimplementation
> > > from scratch of the Steimberg api, something like Linux
> > > of posix api...
> > >
> > >
> > So this is legal ?
> Interfaces are not subject to the same rules of implementations (iirc),
> just like you can't 'copyright' a II-V-I chord progression, whereas you
> can do it for a melody.
> > If it is... then why don't "we" make a native linux VST for things like
> > Ardour, and by "we" I mean someone else than me, preferable one who
> > actualy know what he/she is doing ;-)
> Actually, this could be a hard job to do...
> If I had the time, I would help to grow a native framework, and
> eventually port available free vst plugins.
> But it's just my opinion...
> > Sandie
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users