<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
<body bgcolor="#333333" text="#CCCCCC">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I'm the maintainer of the dssi-vst
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://breakfastquay.com/dssi-vst/">http://breakfastquay.com/dssi-vst/</a><br>
(see note near the end)<br>
I plan to have a 1.0 version done later this year, I'm currently
busy with other stuff.<br>
I have dssi-vst building and working on both 32bit and 64bit
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpad.net/~kxstudio-team/+archive/plugins/+sourcepub/3315787/+listing-archive-extra">https://launchpad.net/~kxstudio-team/+archive/plugins/+sourcepub/3315787/+listing-archive-extra</a><br>
Feel free to pitch my packaging to the current dssi-vst debian
It uses a small tweak to prevent building against gcc-4.6 (used in
12.04), which can be removed.<br>
On 09/12/2013 05:43 PM, Len Ovens wrote:<br>
type="cite">cjwatson is wondering if we should keep dssi-vst
around. Debian has dropped it because it will not build. We can
not ship it as default becasue 64bit can't include it. Adding it
later to 64bit pulls in lots of 32bit libs and wine. (our 32 bit
iso already has all of it of course) He suggests if we want it one
of use should maintain it in debian. It has been left in for now.
My hope is that falktx's stuff can replace it :) (as soon as it
gets into debian we can sync request or whatever.