On Oct 16, 2012 11:50 PM, "Len Ovens" <<a href="mailto:len@ovenwerks.net">len@ovenwerks.net</a>> wrote: > > What do we want to do with this? (bug #1066401 for those who care) The > upgrade does what it should in effect, but the end result is not the same > as a fresh install. The big difference is that the photography meta is > only half there and the publishing meta is not there at all. We can SRU > these two metas into Desktop till after next LTS and that would fix that. > It would also install more software into the user machine they may not > need/want. > > We can accept the install as is (so long as the machine runs right with > what SW it does have) and include an install note that allows the user to > install those metas if they choose. We could go back to only recommending > a fresh install. > > Anyway, I am doing an upgrade test. I think I will pass it if things work > after it is done (that is everything else looks ok) and we can worry about > what to do later. > > Comments? I trust your judgement, and will help as needed. I can see issues/benefits with either option. I think I like going with the sru so some software is still there. Either way, it'll be documented and workable. I'm with you Len, and I appreciate your time. > > > -- > Len Ovens > <a href="http://www.OvenWerks.net">www.OvenWerks.net</a> > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list > <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel</a>