<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Fritz Meissner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:meissner.fritz@gmail.com">meissner.fritz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">
</div>
Things like running JACK with pasuspend are the sort of "cleaning up"<br>
and integration work that I was thinking would take some time to work<br>
through. I had been thinking it would be best to wait for this to<br>
happen before starting testing, but I suppose that the sooner testers<br>
start checking, the sooner these things will be found and fixed.<br></blockquote><div><br>I believe that qjackctl invoking pasuspender is an already established mechanism and was implemented as far back as Hardy. It is possible that this has not/will not change until JACK2 is implemented but I don't know this for fact. I suppose it is equally possible that JACK will now pass audio to Pulse Audio under Lucid. But the last two sentences are both speculative and not based on any tangible evidence.<br>
<br>I haven't talked directly at length to any Ubuntu Studio developers about this, nor have I done any testing of my own. I am hoping to start testing the -generic vs. -lowlatency/-preempt kernels this weekend, which I will prepend with a few rudimentary tests of Pulse Audio and JACK so I have a better understanding of their audio integration state.<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Your comment about jack2 : is that something for the future, or are<br>
you saying that jack 2 is already in Lucid ?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Fritz<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>JACK2 is not in Lucid. I believe that JACK in Lucid is jackd-0.118.<br><br>Two of the Ubuntu Studio developers were discussing JACK2 the other day on IRC. The consensus was that JACK2 implementation would be for Lucid+1 (i.e. the release following Lucid).<br>
<br>My guess is that the reasoning is twofold: it would be prudent to not introduce to great of a change at one time and those qualified to address any problems or bugs for JACK2 implementation is an extremely limited quantity.<br>
<br>Regards,<br>ScottL<br>