<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Nick Fellows <<a href="mailto:nick.fellows@gmail.com">nick.fellows@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I would also like to see other types of devices included such as things like this ... <a href="http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProKeysSono88.html" target="_blank">http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProKeysSono88.html</a> or midi control surfaces. that sort of thing? On another note - Rosegarden includes patches for instruments such as the RM1x (I submitted the original patch for this instrument) It would be useful if this kind of thing was included too Cheers Nick ... <div><div></div><div class="h5"> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jussi Schultink <<a href="mailto:jussi01@gmail.com">jussi01@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ricardo Lameiro <<a href="mailto:ricardolameiro@gmail.com">ricardolameiro@gmail.com</a>> > wrote: >> >> Sorry, but i think that nick had a great Idea. >> >> Jussi, we should not duplicate, but better make a specialized one. >> <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport</a> In here, I just searched for edirol >> audio boards and only are there 2. the ua-4fx now works with advanced mode >> (i myself tested the patch before going to the alsa drivers at kernel) and i >> use an FA-101 (firewire device) that uses FFADO drivers + JACK and it works. >> So that list is outdated and is not aimed at PRO hardware or specific >> solutions. One of the 2, either we make our own list or we try to update the >> hardware list at ubuntu. > > Yes, it is under populated, but why should we then make a new list? > this is on a wiki, we can edit it and make it better, lets use the resource, > add links to our ubuntu studio pages to it and generally make it better. > >> >> I think we should make one in the ubuntu webpage, so if anyone wanting >> audio has a link at the ubuntustudio webpage and follow it. the 2 can be >> complementing pages. Maybe our list could be a test case. Each one puts its >> hardware and some caracteristics. (jack,also support, latency, mixer, >> etc...) I will contribute with my hardware. >> > I dont think its necessary to make something new. lets engage with whoever > is maintaining the current pages, (ubuntu docs team?) or if unmaintained, > lets just whack them into shape. As I said before, its a wiki, we can all > edit it. > Cheers, > Jussi. > >> 2010/2/4 Jussi Schultink <<a href="mailto:jussi01@gmail.com">jussi01@gmail.com</a>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Nick Fellows <<a href="mailto:nick.fellows@gmail.com">nick.fellows@gmail.com</a>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ubuntu Studio is a great platform for Audio and Multimedia tasks, I use >>>> it for >>>> writing / composing music. >>>> >>>> I've been using Linux for quite some time and welcome the distro as it >>>> provides a good consolidated platform for my needs. >>>> >>>> I have a suggestion - Maybe the Ubuntu Studio website could house a >>>> hardware compatibility list . >>>> It would be great if it could focus on Audio hardware and include >>>> studio equipment. >>> >>> This kind of List already exists in a generic ubuntu sense >>> (<a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupport</a>), and there are specific sections >>> for audio hardware. >>> I don't think we want to duplicate this, IMHO. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Audio hardware is difficult to select when building a linux based >>>> studio setup as there are still a >>>> manufacturers out there not providing drivers or adhering to USB Audio >>>> standards. >>>> >>>> Perhaps this could be made possible by community contributions? >>>> >>>> What do people think about this as an idea for discussion ? >>>> >>>> Kind Regards >>>> >>>> Nick ... >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jussi. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >>>> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel</a> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >>> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel</a> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Fagote / Contrafagote >> Bassoon / Contra-bassoon >> <a href="http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro" target="_blank">http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro</a> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list >> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel</a> >> > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list > <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel</a> > > -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel</a> </div></div></blockquote><div> Ricardo/Nick, Has either of you edited the Ubuntu Studio wiki to include the link to the hardware list? Jussi's point still stands, _anyone_ (including you) can edit it and add it. If everyone who had an idea took the time to edit the wiki, even a very small minor edit like this one, we would have a vastly superior wiki. Regards, ScottL </div></div>