Hey Developers, I was just curious if you thought adding Xwax <a href="http://www.xwax.co.uk">http://www.xwax.co.uk</a> to the audio meta packages was a good idea. It just recently got put into Karmic's repositories (is uploading as I type). My arguments for: - Very stable DJ tool - Lightweight (about 30KB) so adding it to the metas will almost go unnoticed by those who don't need it - Is Jack aware My thoughts why not: - Mixxx does the same thing and is already in the metas though mixxx is not jack aware ( Bug #360590 ) and is quite often unstable on people systems (not performance ready) due partly to it's large size and feature set. Essentially, xwax is a sharper knife for DJs that want to use timecoded vinyl. It's jack aware, stable, and fast. Mixxx does this job too, but until jack is in main it's relegated to poor audio performance and can get quite clunky for the end user. Adding Xwax (with no menu entry, or gui start feature - started via command line only because of all the settings needed upon launch) will go literally unnoticed by most, but any DJ will be very happy to find it already on their system. I vote that it should be included simply because there's not enough reason to keep it out. What are your thoughts? -Eric Hedekar -- _______________________________________ <a href="http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com">http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com</a>