On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Cory K. <<a href="mailto:coryisatm@ubuntu.com">coryisatm@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Luis de Bethencourt wrote:<br>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Cory K. <<a href="mailto:coryisatm@ubuntu.com">coryisatm@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Do we want to follow Ubuntu and enable Compiz for our Intrepid release?<br>
>> Maybe turn it on now for testing and see how it goes? Keeping an eye on<br>
>> things like Blender and A/V apps.<br>
>><br>
>> -Cory \m/<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Definetly keep an eye of how it behaves with apps like Blender.<br>
><br>
> We should think of a default configuration that would be pleasing for<br>
> our users. Or are we going with the default ubuntu one? We can use the<br>
> chance to have different cooler settings. Which doesnt mean more<br>
> bling, but rethinking about the choices.<br>
><br>
> Luis<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Anyone else?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>I'm no dev, but I'd be in favor of seeing compiz become default for UbuntuStudio. There are many very useful workflow features that it adds to the desktop, while also providing the flashyness that attracts many artists to an OS. But if that means sacrificing stability, performance, on even one of the flagship apps (blender), then no.<br>
<br>-Eric<br><br>-- <br>_______________________________________<br> <a href="http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com">http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com</a>