[ubuntu-studio-devel] Shouldn't rtirq become a systemd unit?
zequence at mousike.me
Thu Aug 6 12:19:41 UTC 2015
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> below is how rtirq currently looks like for the systemd based Wily and
> below that how a systemd solution could look like .
> It shows the rtirq service file. Btw. moving rtirq to bin comes with a
> convenient side effect, a user simply can run "rtirq status" by command
> line, without a path or service wrapper.
> Is there a reason that rtirq for Ubuntu Studio still is an init file for
> sysvinit or upstart usage and the used init process is ignored?
rtirq, like most of the packages we provide is packaged in Debian. We do
very little packaging work, but when we do, it is preferred to do it in
If you like, you can ask the Debian Multimedia team about this. It is
they who package most of the multimedia packages we provide.
More information about the ubuntu-studio-devel