[ubuntu-studio-devel] [LAU] A survey if you don't mind
Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Wed Oct 22 17:49:16 UTC 2014
I canceled the mail I send from the wrong mail account ;).
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at rocketmail.com>
To: ubuntu-studio-devel <ubuntu-studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com>
Cc: willgodfrey at musically.me.uk, Len Ovens <len at ovenwerks.net>
Subject: Re: [LAU] A survey if you don't mind
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:44:49 +0200
Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7
> -------- Forwarded Message --------From: Will Godfrey
> <willgodfrey at musically.me.uk>
> To: linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> Subject: Re: [LAU] A survey if you don't mind
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:33:24 +0100
> Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:19:38 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 19:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 17:43 +0100, Will J Godfrey wrote:
> > > > As I expected, for audio it's over 70% jack.
> > >
> > > That's the surprise for me, I expected around 90%.
> >
> > Do most of the 30% use ALSA or do much of them use something like
> > pulse->jack?
>
> No, 16% either, 7 % alsa
Please, keep this in mind! An artist production distro should also care
about sane audio production. If just 7% of 30% use ALSA, then likely
several people are used to adopt the distro's default. I suspect that
several people installed Ubuntu Studio and go with pulse->jack for audio
production. Hopefully I'm mistaken, if not, than please drop this
approach.
More information about the ubuntu-studio-devel
mailing list