[testcases] Creation of Ubuntu Studio specific testcase

[Ho Wan Chan]

Thanks Kaj.

I have already changed it to testcase format in
http://packages.qa.dev.stgraber.org/qatracker/milestones/225/builds/16300/testcases/1336/results.
Click on the testcase tab to actually see the testcase (you can't hand in
results:P)

The final date of editing the testcase wiki page is 10/10/2012. Any final
changes will be made and I will import the testcase to the main ISO QA
Tracker before the RC testing begins. So then we can actually make sure the
test can be used in 12.10 cycle for testing.

As in the wiki we need someone to continue write contents about graphics,
video and monitor setup. If anyone is interested just edit the wiki in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/QuantalTestcaseUpdates/UbuntuStudioTestcase

Thank you all on the support.

Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)


2012/9/29 Kaj Ailomaa <zequence at mousike.me>

> **
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:36:48 +0200, Micah Gersten <micahg at ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 09/24/2012 10:06 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:36:20 +0200, Ho Wan Chan <smartboyhw at gmail.com><smartboyhw at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>  <snip>
>
>
>  I think it will be a better idea to just let people who want to help
> with the testcase to edit the testcase in a wiki. So I created a wiki page
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/QuantalTestcaseUpdates/UbuntuStudioTestcase to
> let you all edit it.
>
>  Actually it is the steps after installation is more important, so you
> can think about what we can add, e.g. audio testing, hardware testing...
>
>  You may have a look at
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/23726/testcases/1434/results
>  and
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/23726/testcases/1433/results and
> look at the examples.
>
>
>  <snip>
>
>  I think we should focus as little as possible on Ubuntu and Xubuntu
> specific test cases, i.e. things that we share with those two distros, as
> those are things that will be corrected without our help.
>  We should keep our testcase economic, and mostly focused on the
> multimedia aspects.
> With whatever customization we do to the desktop, that should be tested
> too, of course.
>
>  As I am not that involved in the desktop customization, I would gladly
> just focus on the multimedia test cases.
>  Perhaps someone could look through the page and try to filter out
> anything that we don't need to test (for reasons stated above)?
>
>
> I would tend to disagree here; as Xubuntu has seen bad interaction between
> various programs in the past (that don't necessarily affect Ubuntu). It
> would be good for Studio to run (not create) the relevant Ubuntu and
> Xubuntu test cases to make sure that the shared functionality functions
> properly with the Studio set of apps.  Of course, testers are free to test
> what they wish.
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
>
> I feel it is a goal for Ubuntu Studio to keep customization of the desktop
> and the system at a minimum, and only customize that which will somehow
> enhance multimedia production.
> At least manual testing should not require testing things that are
> identical on other platforms.
> Especially since we are quite undermanned, which is something I hope could
> change in the future.
>
> I made some editing to
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/QuantalTestcaseUpdates/UbuntuStudioTestcase, but it's still very much under construction.
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/attachments/20120929/32af0db0/attachment.html>