LMMS?

[Ho Wan Chan]

Anyway talk about it in R cycle...Feature Freeze is here...

2012/10/2 Mike Holstein <mikeh789 at gmail.com>

> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Kaj Ailomaa <zequence at mousike.me> wrote:
>
>> **
>> On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:15:30 +0200, Scott Lavender <
>> scottalavender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ho Wan Chan <smartboyhw at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> In #ubuntustudio today somebody asked if we should add LMMS to it.
>>>
>>> I agree we need to since it is a crucial part of the system and it takes
>>> only about 10 MB of disk space so...
>>>
>>> BTW I talked to Nicholas Skaggs and the final decision was to dump the
>>> manual partitioning and auto-resize testcases and only remain the entire
>>> disk one along with live session and the forecoming post-installation
>>> testcases.
>>>
>>> Thanks everybody
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>>>
>>>
>> I think characterizing this as "a crucial part of the system" might be
>> misrepresenting LMMS as I think Ubuntu Studio is quite functional in
>> numerous use cases.
>>
>> We should also consider how many people are asking for LMMS. If we
>> included every application asked for, we would easily oversize the 4gig
>> image. I have been worried about making everyone download extra megs (oh,
>> won't someone think of the bandwidth) because one person said we should
>> include something.
>>
>> However, I am not opposed to including it. I just want to make sure we
>> evaluate the inclusion on it's own merits, that we are supported a complete
>> work flow (i.e. there are no other applications needed to support getting
>> the task done), and the user demand warrants inclusion.
>>
>> I look forward to other's input.
>>
>> ScottL
>>
>>
>> I think it's a valid addition.
>> I know some people prefer this kind of applications to Qtractor or Ardour.
>> On their homepage they make reference to LMMS being a Linux alternative
>> to FL Studio. In my experience there are FL Studio people, and then there
>> is the other kind.
>> Don't use it myself, but I definitely think it fills a workflow hole for
>> a good portion of people.
>>
>> i found LMMS to be crashy in 10.04... and i havent used it since really.
> if its stable and something that others want added, im OK with that. i
> always thought that even if it worked and was stable, my opinion was that
> it was "toy-ish"... we cant include *everything* and there are some key
> pieces of my workflow that are not installed that i have no issues with
> installing on my own. however, if someone wants to host a meeting, and
> "vote" on the inclusion of LMMS, i'll come and participate, and not vote it
> down, since i have no strong opinions other than it needs to be stable.
>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
>> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> MH
>
> mikeholstein.info <http://www.mikeholstein.info/>
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/attachments/20121002/362710f7/attachment.html>