Plymouth text version
ttoine at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 21:28:26 UTC 2012
Both. For me Ubuntu Studio should behave the same way than Vanilla with our
artwork. I don't see why we should do something different. And I guess that
most of end users don't care, if it works well.
If it can save time too for other more important stuff then it is good too.
Le 12 nov. 2012 22:02, "Len Ovens" <len at ovenwerks.net> a écrit :
> On Mon, November 12, 2012 12:45 pm, ttoine wrote:
> > I think that we should (if possible) let plymouth like in Vanilla Ubuntu.
> > And only changing lighdm.
> Just to be clear, You are talking about how and when plymouth is started
> rather than the "artwork" for plymouth?
> > 2012/11/12 Len Ovens <len at ovenwerks.net>
> >> On Mon, November 12, 2012 10:45 am, lukefromdc at hushmail.com wrote:
> >> > There are other ways to make plymouth start quickly than installing
> >> > cryptsetup, but that's the easiest way for an end user and least
> >> likely
> >> to
> >> > get reverted by some update.
> >> The first question for studio is do we want to fix this? Should Ubuntu
> >> Studio set plymouth to start earlier than vanilla to avoid a long blank
> >> screen during boot?
> >> Comments please!
> >> I think we need to decide this before we decide the versioning issue.
> >> --
> >> Len Ovens
> >> www.OvenWerks.net
> >> --
> >> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> >> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
> Len Ovens
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel