Kernel-lowlatency vs kernel-rt
ttoine at ttoine.net
Sat Nov 3 00:19:53 UTC 2012
If you don't need restricted drivers, -rt kernel is better than the
-lowlatency. For audio, and for midi. If you need the restricted driver of,
for example, nvidia or amd/ati graphic cards, -rt may not work. That's why
there is the -lowlatency kernel.
2012/11/3 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:58:39 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> > Hi :)
> > on Ubuntu Studio Quantal I switched to
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux qrc 3.6.5-rt14 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Fri Nov 2 21:36:37 CET 2012
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > A kernel-rt seems to be much better on my machine.
> > With the kernel-lowlatency for a very small audio session,
> Resp. a MIDI session using virtual synth.
> > CPU usage "< 10%", I get xruns with
> > sample_rate=48000
> > frames_period=512
> > Now, with the kernel-rt everything seems to be [Ok] with
> > frames_period=256
> > but with frames_period=128 I get xruns again.
> > Regards,
> > Ralf
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel